Lesson 05 Executive OPSEC & Counter-Collection
Theme:

Facilitator Notes & Model Answers — Lesson 05

For instructors and self-study · Model OPSEC analysis and poll rationale

Model OPSEC analysis — Principal M

StepModel output
1 · Critical informationWhich decisions M is about to make; when and where M travels next; who M is meeting; which suppliers M relies on
2 · ThreatA hostile service (wants decisions & relationships; strong OSINT + technical) and a criminal group (wants access & money; OSINT + HUMINT)
3 · VulnerabilitiesWidely shared calendar; advance-published travel; aide photos with location; procurement records naming partners; mixed personal/corp devices
4 · RiskHighest: live calendar + travel signature (predictable interception). Next: aide posts (confirm location). Lower: static bio
5 · CountermeasuresDeny: restrict calendar detail/audience. Disrupt: vary routes/timing; compartmentalise logistics. Degrade: brief aides to delay/scrub location posts

Why the poll answer is C (recurring calendar & travel, in real time)

Teaching point: participants over-weight static, "sensitive-sounding" facts and under-weight live, mundane patterns. Opportunity in time and space is the currency of targeting.

Homework — what good looks like

Task 1

A strong analysis names non-obvious indicators (e.g., the aide who confirms arrival by posting) and ends in owned countermeasures, not vague "be careful." The best submissions assign the behaviour change to a specific person.

Task 2

Good wording is concrete and framed as protection: "Could you hold off posting our location until we've left? It helps keep the team's movements private." Blame-free and actionable beats "stop posting."

Task 3

Any real setting change counts; the learning is recognising that apps publish pattern-of-life by default.